• Home
  • Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
      Editorial Board
      Indexing
      Sources of Financing
      Ethics & Policies
      Publication Ethics Conflict of Interest Open Access Policy Archiving Complaints Policy Privacy Statement Corrections and Retractions Anti-plagiarism Policy Generative AI Policy
      For Authors
      Terms of Publication Formatting Guidelines Peer Review Process Article Processing Charges License Agreement
  • Submission
  • Contacts
en
  • Русский
  • Кыргыз

Journal of Human Biology and Clinical Medicine

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy Generative AI Policy
  • Contacts

Article

  • Read article
  • Download article

Received 19.01.2026

Revised 22.04.2026

Accepted 05.06.2026

Retrieved from Vol. 2, No. 2, 2026

Pages 20 -31

  • 311 Views

Suggested citation

Almanbekova, A. (2026). Advances in primary headache disorder management: A review of pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies with emphasis on European evidence. Journal of Human Biology and Clinical Medicine, 2(2), 20-31. https://doi.org/10.63621/jhbcm/2.2026.20

Advances in primary headache disorder management: A review of pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies with emphasis on European evidence

Aiperi Almanbekova

Abstract

Primary headache disorders – migraine, tension-type headache, and cluster headache – represented one of the leading causes of years lived with disability worldwide, imposing a substantial socioeconomic burden across Europe, with annual costs estimated in billions of euros owing to lost productivity and increased healthcare utilisation. The aim of research was to critically evaluate evidence on pharmacological and non-pharmacological management of primary headache disorders published between 2019 and 2024, with a specific focus on European clinical data and guideline recommendations, in order to provide practitioners with an immediately applicable, evidence-based update. CGRP monoclonal antibodies (erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, eptinezumab) demonstrated ≥ 50% responder rates of 40-60% and mean reductions of 3-8 monthly migraine days, with real-world European registry persistence exceeding 70% at 12 months – substantially outperforming traditional oral preventives. Oral gepants (atogepant for prevention; rimegepant for acute and preventive use) offered effective, cardiovascular-safe alternatives supported by both pivotal trials and European real-world cohorts. For cluster headache, high-flow oxygen (≥ 12 L/min) and subcutaneous sumatriptan 6 mg remained gold-standard acute treatments, while galcanezumab was the only biologic with strong evidence for episodic cluster headache prevention. Non-pharmacological interventions – cognitive behavioural therapy, biofeedback, structured aerobic exercise, and non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation – demonstrated moderate-to-high efficacy in reducing headache frequency and disability across all three disorders. Integrated multidisciplinary approaches combining pharmacological and behavioural strategies consistently showed superior long-term outcomes compared with monotherapy. European real-world data revealed meaningful improvements in quality of life, work productivity, and reductions in medication-overuse headache, confirming the applicability of guideline recommendations across diverse healthcare contexts. The findings provided neurologists, headache specialists, and primary care practitioners with a comprehensive, evidence-based synthesis of modern European management strategies, supporting a shift toward personalised, multidisciplinary headache care. Sustained implementation of European guidelines, harmonised cross-country access to novel therapies, and continued long-term safety monitoring remained essential priorities

Keywords:

migraine; tension-type headache; preventive therapy; non-pharmacological interventions; evidence-based neurology

References

  1. GBD 2016 Headache Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990-2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(11):954–6. DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30322-3
  2. Ashina M, Katsarava Z, Do TP, Buse DC, Pozo-Rosich P, Özge A, et al. Migraine: Epidemiology and systems of care. The Lancet. 2021;397(10283):1485–95. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32160-7
  3. Linde M, Gustavsson A, Stovner LJ, Steiner TJ, Barré J, Katsarava Z, et al. The cost of headache disorders in Europe: The Eurolight project. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19(5):703–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2011.12.008
  4. Steiner TJ, Stovner LJ. Global epidemiology of migraine and its implications for public health and health policy. Nat Rev Neurol. 2023;19(2):109–17. DOI: 10.1038/s41582-022-00763-1
  5. Karlsson WK, Zhuang ZA, Al-Khazali HM, Tomlison A, de la Torre ER, Cipriani A, et al. Comparative effects of drug interventions for the acute management of migraine episodes in adults: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2024;386:e080107. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2024-080107
  6. Sacco S, Amin FM, Ashina M, Bendtsen L, Deligianni CI, Gil-Gouveia R, et al. European Headache Federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene related peptide pathway for migraine prevention – 2022 update. J Headache Pain. 2022;23:67. DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01431-x
  7. Caronna E, Gallardo VJ, Egeo G, Vázquez MM, Castellanos CN, Membrilla JA, et al. Redefining migraine prevention: Early treatment with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies enhances response in the real world. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2024;95:927–37. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2023-333295
  8. May A, Evers S, Goadsby PJ, Leone M, Manzoni GC, Pascual J, et al. European Academy of Neurology guidelines on the treatment of cluster headache. Eur J Neurol. 2023;30(10):2955–79. DOI: 10.1111/ene.15956
  9. Diener HC, Kropp P, Dresler T, Evers S, Förderreuther S, Gaul C, et al. Management of medication overuse (MO) and medication overuse headache (MOH) S1 guideline. Neurol Res Pract. 2022;4:37. DOI: 10.1186/s42466-022-00200-0
  10. Probyn K, Bowers H, Mistry D, Caldwell F, Underwood M, Patel S, et al. Non-pharmacological self-management for people living with migraine or tension-type headache: A systematic review including analysis of intervention components. BMJ Open. 2017;7(8):e016670. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-016670
  11. Onan D, Arikan H, Ekizoğlu E, Taşdelen B, Özge A, Martelletti P. The efficacy of physiotherapy approaches in chronic tension-type headache: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2025;39(1);34–48. DOI: 10.22514/jofph.2025.003
  12. Page MJ, Boutron I, Tetziaff JM, Chou R, Laiu MM, Mayo-Wilson E, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71
  13. Diener HC, Holle-Lee D, Nägel S, Dresler T, Gaul C, Göbel H, et al. Treatment of migraine attacks and prevention of migraine: Guidelines by the German Migraine and Headache Society and the German Society of Neurology. Clin Transl Neurosci. 2019;3(1). DOI: 10.1177/2514183X18823377
  14. Fernández-Bravo-Rodrigo J, Cavero‑Redondo I, Lucerón-Lucas-Torres M, Martínez-García I, Flor-García A, Barreda-Hernández D, et al. Real-world effectiveness and safety of erenumab for the treatment of migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pharmacol. 2024;976:176702. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.176702
  15. Corasaniti MT, Lawrence GW, Bagetta G, Iannacchero R, Tarsitano A, Monteleone A, et al. Combination of anti-CGRP/CGRP-R mAbs with onabotulinumtoxin A as a novel therapeutic approach for refractory chronic migraine: A retrospective study of real-world clinical evidence and a protocol for a double-blind, randomized clinical trial to establish the efficacy and safety. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1296577. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1296577
  16. Silberstein SD, Holland S, Freitag F, Dodick DW, Argoff C, Ashman E. Evidence-based guideline update: Pharmacological treatment for episodic migraine prevention in adults. Neurology. 2012;78(17):1337–45. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182535d20
  17. Schwedt TJ, Lee J, Knievel K, McVige J, Wang W, Wu Z, et al. Real-world persistence and costs among patients with chronic migraine treated with onabotulinumtoxinA or calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023;29(10):1119–31. DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.10.1119
  18. Grazzi L, Montisano DA, Canella M, Marcosano M, Altamura C, et al. Real-world effectiveness of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies compared to onabotulinumtoxinA (RAMO) in chronic migraine: A retrospective observational multicenter cohort study. J Headache Pain. 2024;25:14. DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01721-6
  19. Zovi A, Langella R, Aloisi AC, De Giorgio C, Del Vecchio M, Dondi C, et al. Real-world effectiveness of calcitonin gene-related peptide-binding monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention: A systematic review. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2024;77(1):e3382. DOI: 10.4212/cjhp.3382
  20. Vernieri F, Brunelli N, Guerzoni S, Iannone LF, Baraldi C, Rao R, et al. Retreating migraine patients in the second year with monoclonal antibodies anti-CGRP pathway: The multicenter prospective cohort RE-DO study. J Neurol. 2023;270:5436–48. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11872-2
  21. Silberstein SD, Holland S, Freitag F, Dodick DW, Argoff C, Ashman E. Evidence-based guideline update: Pharmacological treatment for episodic migraine prevention in adults. Neurology. 2012;78(17):1337–45. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182535d20
  22. Lipton RB, Fanning KM, Buse DC, Martin VT, Hohaia LB, Adams AM, et al. Migraine progression in subgroups of migraine based on comorbidities: Results of the CaMEO study. Neurology. 2019;93(24):e2224–e36. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000008589
  23. Xie R, Li J, Jing Y, Tian J, Li H, Cai Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of simple analgesics for acute treatment of episodic tension-type headache in adults: A network meta-analysis. Ann Med. 2024;56(1):2357235. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2357235
  24. Qin L, Song P, Li X, Yang L, Xu, F, Zhu X, et al. Tension-type headache management: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of complementary and alternative medicine. Pain Ther. 2024;13:691–717. DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00600-x
  25. de Freitas Dias B, Robinson CL, Villar-Martinez MD, Ashina S, Goadsby PJ. Current and novel therapies for cluster headache: A narrative review. Pain Ther. 2025;14:1–19. DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00674-7
  26. Dodick DW, Goadsby PJ, Spierings ELH, Scherer JC, Sweeney SP, Grayzel DS. Safety and efficacy of LY2951742, a monoclonal antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide, for the prevention of migraine: A phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(9):885–92. DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70128-0
  27. Barbosa da Silva M, de Oliveira Ferreira DBC, Mendieta CD, da Silva HP, Nogueira-Rosa LA, Moraes-Figueiredo N. Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for cluster headache preventive treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Res. 2025;47(1):63–76. DOI: 10.1080/01616412.2024.2440022
  28. Silberstein SD, Mechtler LL, Kudrow DB, Calhoun AH, McClure C, Saper JR, et al. Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for the acute treatment of cluster-type headaches: Findings from the randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled ACT1 study. Headache. 2016;56(8):1317–32. DOI: 10.1111/head.12896
  29. Goadsby PJ, de Coo IF, Silver N, Tyagi A, Ahmed F, Gaul C, et al. Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for the acute treatment of episodic and chronic cluster headache: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled ACT2 study. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(5):959–69. DOI: 10.1177/0333102417744362
  30. Eigenbrodt AK, Ashina H, Khan S, Diener HC, Mitsikostas DD, Sinclair AJ, et al. Diagnosis and management of migraine in ten steps. Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17:501–14. DOI: 10.1038/s41582-021-00509-5
  31. Nestoriuc Y, Martin A. Efficacy of biofeedback for migraine: A meta-analysis. Pain. 2007;128(1):111–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.09.007
  32. Souren R, Winteler BR, Bischoff N, Fluri O, Grolimund J, Scutelnic A, et al. Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary headache management program: An open-label pilot study. Clin Transl Neurosci. 2025;9(2):27. DOI: 10.3390/ctn9020027
  33. Dittrich SM, Günther V, Franz G, Burtscher M, Holzner B, Kopp M. Aerobic exercise with relaxation: Influence on pain and psychological well-being in female migraine patients. Clin J Sport Med. 2008;18(4):363–5. DOI: 10.1097/jsm.0b013e31817efac9
  34. Puledda F, Shields K. Non-pharmacological approaches for migraine. Neurotherapeutics. 2018;15(2):336–45. DOI: 10.1007/s13311-018-0623-6
  35. Rains JC, Poceta JS, Penzien DB. Sleep disorders and headache. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2008;8:167–5. DOI: 10.1007/s11910-008-0027-9
  36. Minen MT, Adhikari S, Seng EK, Berk T, Jinich S, Powers SW, et al. Smartphone-based migraine behavioral therapy: A single-arm study with assessment of mental health predictors. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2:46. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0116-y
  37. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(1):1–211. DOI: 10.1177/0333102417738202
  38. Ailani J, Burch RC, Robbins MS. The American Headache Society Consensus Statement: Update on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice. Headache. 2021;61(7):1021–39. DOI: 10.1111/head.14153
  39. Yang S, Orlova Yu, Park H. Cardiovascular safety of anti-CGRP Monoclonal antibodies in older adults or adults with disability with migraine. JAMA Neurol. 2024;82(2):132–41. DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.4537
  40. Van der Arend BWH, Van Veelen N, De Ruijter JET, Olsen MH, MaassenVanDenBrink A, Terwindt GM. Safety considerations in the treatment with anti-CGRP(R) monoclonal antibodies in patients with migraine. Front Neurol. 2024;15:1387044. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1387044
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp

Address
723500, Kyrgyz Republic, Osh city,
Alymbek Datka Street, 428


Email
journal@humanbiomed.com

Main information
  • Aims and Scope
  • Indexing
  • Terms of Publication
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Ethics
Additional information
  • Complaints Policy
  • Peer Review Process
  • Open Access Policy
  • Anti-plagiarism Policy Generative AI Policy
  • Archiving